The Best User-Generated Video Contests I’ve Seen

May 31st, 2009

I’m in the process of researching and writing two Forrester reports about user-generated online video contests [8 July 2009 update: I've posted some of the research findings], so I’ve spent a lot of time recently talking to contest vendors and to marketers who’ve run video contests. I’ve also been reviewing every contest I can find online.

In the course of my research, I’ve been keeping track of the best contests I’ve seen. Of course, “best” is subjective, and it doesn’t always mean “most entries” or “most video views.” I’ll be honest: of the hundreds of contests I’ve reviewed, I’ve seen far more failed efforts than successful ones. But some contests do a wonderful job of finding the right premise, of choosing the right prize, or of engaging in the right promtional tactics. And a select few — including Shakira, Doritos, and Tourism Queensland — are lucky enough to get all three of those pieces spot on.

I’m still working on my research — and will continue to look for other great examples of how marketers have used online video contests. So if you have an example you’d like to see on this list, please leave it in the comments below, and I may add it to my list. But for now, these are the best I’ve seen:

Media & Entertainment

Consumer Packaged Goods

Food & Beverage

Financial Services

Travel & Tourism

Retail & Apparel

Consumer Electronics

Information Technology

B2B

Other

Again, if you know any other great video contests that should be on this list, tell me in the comments below. And if you’re looking for a more comprehensive list of video contests, check out OnlineVideoContests.com, or contest vendors like Meme Labs, Votigo and Strutta.

[Updated on 24 September 2009 to add new contests from Google, Sandisk, 3M, Okanagan Spring, Baskin Robbins, Microsoft, TCBY, and the Olympics.]

Call for Participation: Driving Offline Influence

May 31st, 2009

I’ve spent a lot of time in the last couple of years researching how people influence each other (see, for instance, my Future of Influence report or my presentation on the topic from the Web 2.0 Expo.) One of the most interesting findings for me was on how consumers prefer to pass along influential messages. You hear these days about consumers posting reviews on their blogs, rating products on commerce sites, and talking about companies in message boards and forums — and there is, in fact, a lot of influence passed through these online channels every day. But the reality is most people prefer to pass along influential messages offline, either face to face or over the phone. And while a face-to-face interactions are a slow way to get a message out — after all, blog posts can reach thousands of people at a time, while conversations usually only include a few people at most — we know that personal conversations carry the very highest level of trust and influence.

So I’m starting a report around how marketers can drive these types of offline influential behavior. If you’ve seen me speak on the topic, you’ve probably heard my favorite example: when Nintendo launched its Wii video game console in Germany, it reached out to early adopters and asked them to host “Wii parties” where their friends could sample the device. My colleague Josh Bernoff often uses another great example: how Hershey’s works with a company called House Party to introduce new types of chocolate. I’m particularly interested in learning more about how marketers use the internet to organize offline events or drive offline influence — and then use social media to help magnify the impact of such events after they’ve taken place.

If you’ve used social media to drive offline influence — or have seen another marketer do it well — I’d love to hear about it. Please leave me a comment in the field below, or email me: nelliott at forrester dot com.

Free research for interactive marketers

May 18th, 2009

If you’re an interactive marketer and you’ve got a few minutes to spare, you’re in luck: Forrester is conducting an Interactive Marketer panel survey, and in return for your time we’ll give you immediate access to your choice of 1 of 3 complementary research reports. We’ll also make sure you get a copy of the research we do based on the survey results. You can find the survey here.

The Golden Rule of SMS Marketing

May 14th, 2009

[cross-posted to the Forrester Interactive Marketing blog]

At Forrester (where I work as an analyst) we continue to see a lot of industry excitement around mobile marketing. In a recent survey more than 60% of mobile marketers told us they’d continue to increase their spending on the channel despite the bad economy. And according to Forrester’s latest ad forecast, mobile marketing spending in the US will more than quintuple over the next five years.

There’s just one problem: SMS is the only mass-reach mobile marketing channel, and no one — not marketers, and certainly not users — seems to like it much.

More than twice as many people use SMS as use the mobile internet — or any other mobile service, for that matter. (The mobile internet and mobile video may well become great ad platforms one day, but the fact is not many consumers use these services right now and those who do use them don’t spend much time with them — meaning there’s simply not much reach or inventory.) And believe it or not SMS can actually work incredibly well for marketers. We regularly hear that SMS campaigns get response rates of 5% to 25%. Better yet, when Calvin Klein and their agency OMD sent SMS messages to a well-targeted SMS list, fully 39% of users who received the message opted in to receive a sample of CK’s new fragrance.

But despite this success, marketers just can’t seem to love SMS as a marketing channel. Some marketers are worried about looming government regulation. And lots of marketers tell us they’re waiting for richer channels (like mobile display ads and mobile video) to come of age. But the biggest problem is that marketers are afraid users will hate them if they send SMS. According to a survey we did in the UK last year, they’re right to be worried. On average, consumers are four times more likely to delete SMS and MMS marketing messages without reading them than they are to take a moment to consider the product or service being offered:

sms

So how can SMS marketers avoid user backlash and generate those great response rates we hear about? I think they need to follow a simple best practice that I call the “golden rule of SMS marketing”: If you can’t target an SMS, then don’t send it. After all, when your marketing is targeted well, users stop thinking of it as marketing and start thinking of it as content, or a service. That’s the reason CK did so well with SMS — they targeted users who were most likely to appreciate the offer of a free sample. In fact, in nearly every successful SMS campaign I’ve heard about, messages were only sent to users who were either pre-qualified or targeted in some other way.

There are two ways for marketers to follow the golden rule of SMS marketing:

  1. Only send messages to your own list. If users have signed up to hear from you by SMS, then you know they’re qualified leads who won’t be offended by your choice of marketing platforms. Every marketer interested in using SMS should work to build a house list of SMS leads — with a contest, a lead form on your site, or if you’re in a hurry by promoting a short code in your traditional marketing efforts like Kraft has done.
  2. Get access to a highly targeted list. Blyk is one good example of a vendor who can segment and target their SMS audience, but at the moment they only operate in the UK and the Netherlands. We haven’t seen many other ad sellers who can do this (if you want to recommend others, do so in the comments below) — but I’ve no doubt we’ll see more operators and vendors take this approach in the future.

If you’re a Forrester client and you want to read more about SMS marketing, check out my report The Joy of Text: Using the Golden Rule of SMS Marketing in Europe or my colleague Neil Strother’s report SMS Marketing: Leveraging Call-to-Action Features of Cell Phones to Maximize Effectiveness.

And as always, I’d love to hear your thoughts — feel free to comment below, and I’ll check back to participate in the conversation.

Call for Participation: UGC Video Contests

March 6th, 2009

I’m starting to look into user-generated online video contests for an upcoming report on the topic — recently I spoke to German video-sharing site myvideo.de about some of their video contests, and yesterday I had a fascinating conversation with the women behind Vancouver-based video contest platform Meme Labs. I’ve got a lot more research to do — both survey work and industry briefings — before this turns into a report, but I wanted to call for participation now.

If you’ve ever worked on a UGC video contest, or run one of your own, I’d like to hear about it — either by e-mail (nelliott at forrester dot com) or in the comments below. What product or service was the contest for? What type of video did you ask users to submit, and what prizes did you offer? How did you promote the contest? How many entries did you get? And how else did you measure success?

Even if you’ve never worked on a video contest, I’d love to hear about the video contests you’ve come across online. There are a lot of crazy video contests out there — like this one for wrenches, or this one for psoriasis — and I want to hear about the best or the worst you’ve ever seen.

Thanks!

My Slides from Northern Voice 2009

February 24th, 2009

This past Saturday I presented my research on the Future of Influence at Northern Voice 2009, a personal blogging and social media conference here in Vancouver. It was a fantastic event — both in terms of content and networking — and I was really pleased with the great feedback I got on my research. Because the event focused on personal social media rather than corporate social media I focused less than usual on advertising and marketing, and instead tried to broaden the presentation to discuss how influence impacts a wide range of topics and content producers.

You can find slides for my Future of Influence presentation on SlideShare.

Photo credit: John Biehler

Our New European Online Ad Forecast is Live

February 4th, 2009

A quick note for clients: our new European online advertising forecast is now live on the Forrester site — and the good news is, we don’t think the market is quite as ugly as some others would have you believe. If you’re not a client, don’t worry, I’ll have a post live in the next few days with the forecast highlights. But for now, clients can get all the details here.

Call for Participation: New Research on Online Ad Targeting and Optimization

January 27th, 2009

Over the past few weeks I’ve conducted about a dozen briefings and interviews for a new report I’m doing on online ad targeting, mostly with vendors and publishers. I’ve also spoken with a couple of advertisers, and pulled some interesting data on targeting from our most recent advertiser executive survey. But to round out the research, I’m looking to speak with a few more advertisers who have hands-on experience with various ad targeting systems: those who’ve set up segments and targeted ads with Tacoda/PlatformA, Wunderloop, Nugg.ad, Revenue Science, or others, who have used the self-service targeting available on MySpace and Facebook, or who have worked with publishers that use DoubleClick’s Adapt optimization engine.

If you’re an advertiser or agency who’s used any of these targeting systems or platforms, I’d be really interested to hear more about how they worked for you. How did you choose which targeting system or vendor to work with (or was it simply a function of which vendor your chosen media outlet was using)? How did total effective CPM of the targeted inventory differ from the CPM you pay on untargeted inventory — and what was the impact on ROI? What did you learn about how best to use targeting technologies — and what advice would you give to others who are just starting out?

I’d be pleased to see your comments below, or to speak with you in more depth — if you want to reach out to me for a detailed conversation, e-mail me at nelliott (at) forrester -dot- com.

Call for Participation: New Research on SMS and MMS Marketing

January 16th, 2009

I’m working on a number of new reports right now — I’m well into a report on display ad targeting, I’m putting together my research plan for a big report on measuring social marketing, and I’ll be working on a report soon about online video creative as well — but there’s one in particular I’d like to ask for your help on: SMS and MMS marketing.

If you’re an advertiser or agency who’s used SMS or MMS marketing lately, I’d love to hear your experiences. Why did you choose to use mobile marketing? How did SMS/MMS fit into your overall marketing strategy? How did you choose the carrier or other vendor you worked with for your campaign? How did the SMS/MMS perform — and what went well (or didn’t go well) with your campaign? Will you be using SMS/MMS again in the future? What advice you have for other marketers looking to use SMS marketing?

I’d be pleased to see your comments below, or to speak with you in more depth — if you want to reach out to me for a detailed conversation, e-mail me at nelliott (at) forrester -dot- com.

Upcoming Speech: Future of Influence, Northern Voice, Vancouver, Feb 21

January 8th, 2009

I’m very happy to report I’ll be speaking on the Future of Influence at the Northern Voice conference in Vancouver on February 21.  I’ve heard great things about this event, and I’m looking forward to attending and participating. I hope to see you there!